2.5/4, 2010s, Action, Fantasy, Marvel, Review

Avengers: Age of Ultron

Image result for avengers age of ultron banner

#13 in my Ranking of The MCU Phases 1-3.

Ensemble pieces are hard. You have several main characters revolving around one goal, but all of these characters should be unique and driven by their own wants and needs, but all of those wants and needs need to be connected to the core of the story. When you take half a dozen heroes who are (largely) off on their own adventures most of the time, it can take some doing, and I don’t think that doing was done quite well enough here.

The Avengers have been wiping out Hydra one base at a time for some months and have come across the final large stronghold. They quip their way to victory, discovering Loki’s spear from the first Avengers as well as two “enhanced” individuals (one who’s fast and the other that’s weird). With the spear, Tony Stark and Bruce Banner begin to analyze it in order to figure out how to take advantage of it. What they end up doing is creating Ultron, an advanced AI that takes a cryptic mission from Tony (“peace in our time”) and twists it in a very Asimov sort of way to mean all of human life must end because there will be no peace with people. He overcomes Tony’s personal digital assistant (Jarvis), inhabits a robotic body and uploads himself to the Internet so he can escape into anything he wishes.

There’s a fight, Ultron escapes, he finds some vibranium (helpfully expanding the MCU slightly in the process with references to Wakanda), and escapes again, this time with the help of the two enhanced. He escapes to South Korea where he uses a scientist to create a “real” body for him (how this is appreciably better than his upgraded body he gets later isn’t really explained). Through another action sequence, the Avengers steal this body and then bring it to life so that it becomes Vision. Everything converges in the invented Central European country Sokovia (where the movie opened) where Ultron, who’s been talking positively of the asteroid that destroyed the dinosaurs throughout the movie, has creating a system that will life the capitol city up in the air before dropping it to the ground with enough force to cause a global extinction event, which the Avengers avert. Because of course.

So, there’s the plot. A lot is going on. I think the stuff around the creation of the body that becomes Vision is really just there so we can get Vision. As part of Ultron’s plan, it feels extraneous at best. His end goal is human extinction. Having some sort of humanish metal body feels just extra. But around this large, somewhat unfocused, plot we have our heroes, and as I implied earlier, not a lot of them seem to be there for any other reason than they are Avengers.

First, let’s talk about what this movie is supposed to be about. The first Avengers was really an excuse to get superheroes together to fight a heavy. The underlying idea was about team building. It was facile, but it worked and every character was functioning towards that goal. In this, the goal seems to be centered around Tony Stark’s desire to create a replacement for the Avengers in the form of a highly intelligent AI that will protect Earth from threats originating from off world. It’s an extension of where Tony was left at the end of Iron Man 3. He wants Iron Man to be unnecessary. The creation he ends up with fights back (using “I’ve got no strings” from Pinocchio quite effectively in a creepy sort of way), and Captain America’s assertion that humans should always be part of the decision making process ends up correct. In terms of characters who seem involved in this thematic idea you have Tony, Bruce Banner, Captain America, and Hawkeye. The rest feel extra, taking the movie in different directions.

Thor is the one who seems the most out of place. He’s there for a literal reason (Loki’s scepter is supposed to go back to Asgard with him), but outside of that he doesn’t really contribute to any of the movie’s core idea. In fact, he famously goes off in the middle of the movie to help inform the audience about Infinity Stones. They sacrificed cohesion of the film itself in order to help sell later installments of the franchise, and the movie suffers for it. Black Widow also feels like she’s in another movie. The exploration of her past is interesting, but I don’t see how it feeds into the ideas at the movie’s core. What this does overall is create a disjointed experience that keeps the movie from coming together as a single work.

There’s quite a few individual pieces of the film that I like quite a bit. The action scenes are fun (though, we get another big CGI army). I really like Ultron himself. He’s not just a quippy form of Loki. He’s driven by an ideology and a set of beliefs all while talking in a way that betrays the malfunction at his core. The relationship that begins to blossom between Natasha and Bruce is both sweet and tied to some interesting unique parts of their characters (Natasha’s insistence that she’s a monster and her ability to draw Bruce out of the Hulk). And I really like the central idea and how that manifests in Ultron. I just wish the movie came together a bit better.

Netflix Rating: 3/5

Quality Rating: 2.5/4

5 thoughts on “Avengers: Age of Ultron”

  1. I had a lot of thoughts about Age of Ultron, which I blogged about back in the day on my site.
    My first time watching it, I mostly just enjoyed the spectacle and the inner life of the characters. As I watched it again, then again, I started seeing deeper. Age of Ultron actually has some pretty deep themes in it. And some deep character work.

    We are deep in the greatest element of the MCU, how each movie begins to deepen the movies that follow. We’re past introductions, mostly, as far as the core characters. And the consequences of past films are starting to pile up. I love that.

    Ultron’s new bodies makes sense, as he’s obsessed with evolution. He wants to keep evolving, iterating, like software, like living organisms. It really works for me. The way he’s able to use vibranium to make a robot body that can turn frigging insubstantial is a good example of showing just how brilliant Ultron is. Super intelligence is hard to express. Marvel does a good job, both with Tony and with Ultron. (Bruce Banner…not so much. He just doesn’t have the acting chops to play smart)

    Tony is getting increasingly obsessive and unbalanced, which will come to a head in Civil War and to an extent in Endgame. Captain America remains the voice of reason and moral clarity. For a selfish actor douche like Chris Evans to pull off this performance is testament to him, to Feige and to the writing staff of the Infinity Saga arc. Cap is always right…until it comes to Bucky, I’d ague and him being wrong is ‘right’ for his character.

    Ultron also has one of the rare examples of ‘guns killing people’. Tony, the weapons maker, has made weapons that bad guys and good guys have used. They are neutral, like all ‘things’ it depends on who uses them. (this is also touched on Iron Man 2 in the congressional hearings scene) But Ultron is ‘made’ by Tony, a weapon with a will of its own. A weapon that chooses to kill. A fascinating twist on a theme. I have no idea if its intentional or not, but it’s beautiful either way.

    The sacrifice of Quicksilver was great and unexpected. There should be consequences to fighting, it keeps things from being just a CGI cartoon. And Elizabeth Olsen turns out to be the best actress of her family. And to have the best rack.

    The more I watch Age of Ultron, the more there is to find. That is pretty special.

    Like

    1. There are definite ideas here, and you highlight some that I hadn’t considered. However, the movie’s so poorly constructed with bits that don’t work towards those thematic ideas as well as taking up large amounts of time.

      From the little I’ve read of the movie’s making, Joss got a lot of mandates about stuff to cover from Feige, and he tried as much as he could to make it work. I think he misses the mark slightly, though.

      And as to Quicksilver, I find his death completely unsuccessful dramatically. Out of all the characters to kill, they kill the one of the two new characters that we feel the least for. Maybe if he had delivered the explanation for their hatred of Stark instead of his sister. His death is just the cheapest death possible with the least emotional impact.

      Like

      1. They were going to kill Hawkeye, allegedly. But changed their minds at the last minute.

        I guess I don’t find it poorly constructed. The character, plot and mood stuff worked well for me. The Avengers start out the movie very overconfident and by the end, they’re humbled. The fight scene between Iron Man and Hulk is both pleasing and has future character implications.

        It’s not perfect, of course. There is room for improvement.
        If you’ve got time, here’s an old post on my mostly-abandoned site for Age of Ultron:
        http://markandrewedwards.com/markblog/movie-review-avengers-2

        I’d be interested to hear more about the construction failures.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s